Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

YOUTH SUES DEALER

Our Own Correspondent.)

Rifle Allegedly Sold with Faulty Mechanism

( From

WAIPUKUR.AU, Last Night. The quoting of passages from the Sale of Goods Act was followed by lengthy legal argument in the Waipukurau Magistrate's Court wh«n, d«fore Mr J. Miller, S.M., a I7-year-old youth, Gordon Bertram Goodeve, oi Ormondville, prosecuted againet Leonard Beachen, sports dealer of Wa^ukurau, to recover £4 15/-, the pur^ase price of a repeating rifle, the bolt of which broke three weelcs after it was purchased from the defendant. No case exactlv similar conld be found, anc! the Magistrate reserved his deeision, saying he would look into the matter on his return to Napier. The case was described as an action for damages for a breach of warrantry, by Mr D. W. Neild, who appeared for the plaintiff, whom, he said, had purchased the rifle on defendant 's recommendation. After he had used it three times the bolt snapped while he was ejecting a used cartridge. It was suggested that tho mechanism was faulty. Unsuccessful efforts wero made througli defenddnt to repair the bolt and then to obtain a new bolt. Defendant had made an offer to supply another rifle on terms that were not acceptable to plaintiff. Beachen gave evidence regarding tlie sale of the rifle, saying plaintiff had wanted ono with a puinp action. Defendant had submitled that a bolt action rifle was stronger. Efforts had been made to secure another bolt, but such a thing was not procurable in New Zealand. There was no guarantco with the rifle. Mr B. W. Johanson, for the defenee, said that the rifle was not sold on defendant ;s Tecommendation and suggeated that the case might coino under a elause covering the sale of an article under a trade name.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBHETR19371220.2.9

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 74, 20 December 1937, Page 3

Word Count
294

YOUTH SUES DEALER Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 74, 20 December 1937, Page 3

YOUTH SUES DEALER Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Volume 81, Issue 74, 20 December 1937, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert