Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NICE LEGAL POINT

• Presa Association.l

Can Woman Sue Husband for Accident Damages? UNIQUE PR0BLEM

fRv TfilGErranh-

INVERCARGILL, Last Night. A question of importanco was argued in the Supreme Court this morning before Mr. Justice Kennedy in tfie first case of its kind to come before the Supreme Court in New Zealand since the passing of the Law Reform Act, 1936. The case an.? from p, collision between two motor cars. Alice Maxide Walsh was a passeiiger in one car driven by. her husband, and Cyril Neville Fairweather was the driver of the other car, An action for damages by Mrs Walsh against Fairbrother is pending. Legal argument was heard by hxs Ilonour whether a third party could be joined as a contributing party, in the event of Mrs. Walsh obtaining damages against defendant. Mr. M. M. MacDonald, counsel for the defendant Fairweather, said his wife, who was a passenger in the car driven by her husband, was elaiming damages from his client. Defendant sought to join the husband as contributing to the accident so that should the plaintiff, Mrs. Walsh, obtain damages against the defendant, the latter could claim a eontribution towards those damages from the husband. Counsel submitted that the wprnan '§ right to compensation for injuries constituted property. He quoted a recent English decision as an huthority for the proposition that a married woindn's expectancy of life was (property. Hq submitted that the trend of the law now was to regard man axid wife as separato entities, and some consideration had been given to that view in modern legislation, Mr. J. C. Prain, who appeared for the plaintiff, Mrs. Walsh, submitted that under the Married Women 's Property Act, 1908, as amended by the Law! Reform Aet, 1936, a wife could not sue her husband for damages sustained in a collision (in this instaxjce) and' "consequently- under the Law Reform Act, there was 110 right of eontribution between tho defenclant &at( the husband as tho third party, ' , Commenting that tho question was a most important one, his Honour said ho would take time to consider his judgment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBHETR19370821.2.23

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 184, 21 August 1937, Page 4

Word Count
348

NICE LEGAL POINT Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 184, 21 August 1937, Page 4

NICE LEGAL POINT Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 184, 21 August 1937, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert