Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ORPHANAGE SCANDAL.

THE DEFENCE

(Pm Press Association.) Christchurch, last night. The Orphanage enquiry was rammed this morning. Evidenoe- wa3 led to show that fhe Matron, Mrs Carpenter, was extremely popular with the children, and that they suffered no hardships. Several of the ohildren gave evidenoe that they had plenty of food and were well treated. When on eifeoce punishment they were allowed to apeak to the Matron and assistants, and the. punishment was not very bad, because they seldom obeyed it. None of them remembered Mrs Carpenter calling the ohildren bad names or sweariog at them. Dr. Crook and other assistants at the hospital also gave evidenoe that children had been under their oharge from time to time, and their never saw any evidences of neglect. They made no complaint. Later.—At the Waltham Orphanage enquiry to-day Frankie Hammond, aged 14, Sarah Smith, aged 17L and Maud Stewart, aged 19£ years, former inmates of the Orphanage, gave evidence that they were kindly treated at the institution, and Mrs Carpenter had not called the ohildren bad names. Members of the institution's committee of the Charitable Aid Board stated that Mrs Carpenter had carried out her duties satisfactorily. No restriction was placed on her in the matter of food. -The enquiry will bo resumed to-day.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19060119.2.30

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1652, 19 January 1906, Page 3

Word Count
212

ORPHANAGE SCANDAL. Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1652, 19 January 1906, Page 3

ORPHANAGE SCANDAL. Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1652, 19 January 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert