Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Millers’ Trust.

(By Telegraph—Press Association.) Wellington, last night. Continuing the argument in the flour milling case in the Court oi Appeal, e&unsel for the defendant company submitted that the agreement was contrary to public Policy, because oi its tendency to limit the output, enhance the price, and prevent an improvement- in the quality of flour. As to the power of tho company to take up shares in the Association, propositions were submitted to bar this, chiefly on the ground that the company piutild not part with the control of its own business or limit itseif in any way; also that the directors had no power to conclude such a transaction, which was out of the usual course.. Latkh.-— Judgment has been reserved: in the flour milling case by the Court of Appeal.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19011030.2.29

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 250, 30 October 1901, Page 2

Word Count
132

Millers’ Trust. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 250, 30 October 1901, Page 2

Millers’ Trust. Gisborne Times, Volume VI, Issue 250, 30 October 1901, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert