Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WAR OFFICE REFORM.

[by electric telegraph—copyright.]

(per press assoclvtion.)

Received this day at 9 7 a.m. London, March (!,

In the House of Lords the debate of the army system was resumed and quietly concluded in view of the corning reform proposals to be introduced by Brodrick. Lord Lansdowno reserved his defence.

The Duke of Devonshire complained of Lord Wolseley'a action in not indicating an instance wherein ho found himself helpless, but doubtless Wolselcy will bo given an opportunity of replying when the enquiry into operations is opened.

Afterwards Lord Salisbury while denying that Lansdowne intended to make a personal attack on Wolselcy, he emphasised unaltered supremacy of the Secretary of War acting on behalf of Parliament over tho entire administration of the army. The result of the system depends not on machines, but on tho brilliancy, vigor and men employed.

In the course of tho army debate Lord Earl Northbrook declared that according to an order in council tho responsibility and condition of the auxiliary forcer rested on the adjutant General who was responsible to the secretary of war. Spencer said tho commander-in-chiefs duty was to give advice to the secretary of war and if the secretary refused to accept same, the responsibility rested with him.

Ilosebery said all mistakes and frictions originated nominally through retaining the commander-in-chief in the pierarchy while really reducing his to a pale shadow only. The tlow of Wolscley's speech was the recommendation to appeal to the public. The Times commenting on the debate considers that real reform will be found to be decentralisation.

In the House of Lord*. Rosebery suggested that a a secret Parliamentary Committee should systematically consult the representatives of the War Office and Admiralty with a view to testing the efficiency of the forces. The Nationalist refusal to divide in the Commons and based the contents that tho closure was intended to facilitate a vote an account of seventeen miiiionswithout discuss'on of the Irish question.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19010307.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 7 March 1901, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
325

THE WAR OFFICE REFORM. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 7 March 1901, Page 3

THE WAR OFFICE REFORM. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 7 March 1901, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert