SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA.
‘ TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —The writer is in complete agreement with “ Opus 1 ” in his criticism of the last concert. May I suggest that in future tho recent conductor, M. de Rose (who brought this now famous orchestra into existence) be invited to give his opinion before items are presented to the paying public? This would at least ensure an experienced and matured judgment on standard. It would be a great loss to musical Dunedin if all his ground work . (often, we know, carried out under conditions of ill-health) should be wasted. The new conductor is to bo congratulated on his appointment with this already famous orchestra, and should find that only a little effort, in comparison to work done, should be necessary to keep \up the high standard attained. In justification of tho suggestion given I will quote— u Unity is Strength. —I am, etc,, _ _ September 21. Tune Ur.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19360921.2.102.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 22449, 21 September 1936, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
152SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA. Evening Star, Issue 22449, 21 September 1936, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in