Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JOINT POLICY

INSURANCE COMPANY LIABLE [Per Uniied Press Association.] WELLINGTON, September 10. The framing of a clause in an insurance policy issued jointly to a firm selling a motor car under a hire-purchase agreement and to the buyer, was the subject of a reserved judgment given in the Supreme Court to-day by Mr Justice Ostler, who ruled that th© fact that the buyer was not the holder of the license when he was involved in a collision did not, on a reasonable construction of the words of the clause, absojye the insurance company from liability. This question of law arose from a damages action, which, with the consent of Fred. Linekar and the Hartford Insurance Company Ltd., was submitted to the Supreme Court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19360911.2.36

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 22441, 11 September 1936, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
123

JOINT POLICY Evening Star, Issue 22441, 11 September 1936, Page 6

JOINT POLICY Evening Star, Issue 22441, 11 September 1936, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert