RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Wkdbsdat, August 18. (Before J. Bathgate, wsq., R. M.) Davis v. .Smith —Claim L2O, for goods supplied. Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed, with coats. Casey v, M‘G-rath—Claim L2 13s 7d, for goods supplied. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs. Wise v. Campbell and Adams—Claim L 27 12s. Judgment was given against the defendant Adams. Oliver and Ulph v. A Wasson—Claim L 37 5s 4d, for goods supplied. Judgment for plaintiffs. for L 34 15s 4d. M'Kay, Fenwick and Co. v. E. de Mont calf. —Claim Lll 12s. Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed. Allen v. Wallace.—Claim L 8 13s Id, for rent. Judgment for plaintiff, amount to be paid in monthly instalments of L2 each. T, Anderson v. Roebuck.—Claim Ll2, for work and labor done. Judgment for plaintiff, with costs. Simmonds v. the N. Z. Shipping Company. —ln this case judgment was given for L 5, with costs. Insley v. Woodhead.—ln this case judgment was given for L2 13s 6d, with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18750818.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3895, 18 August 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
166RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3895, 18 August 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in