Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. This Day.

(Before I. N. Watt, Esq., R.M.) CIVIL CASES, Asher v. Simpson,—Mr Harris appeared for plaintiff, and Mr Wilson for defendant. The case was adjourned by consent until the 6th prox. Do wo v. Pollock.-Claim L 4, for work and labor done. Mr Stewart for plaintiff, and Mr Howorth for defendant. Defendant disputed the claim on the grounds that no special agreement had been entered into with plaintiff, and that the charge was excessive—Plaintiff said that he had been employed to work at defendant’s coal pit. The usual rate of wages for laborers was one shilling per hour, and that was the rate charged by him. —Two witnesses on behalf of defendant stated that they received 8s per day, and that there were no fixed hours for coming to or leaving work. Some days they had to work longer time than on other days. — His Worship thought that plaintiffs ease was exceptional, and that he was entitled to the sum sued for. —Judgment for amount claimed, with costs. Pritchard v. Johnson.—Claim, L2 15s lid, for plough-shares. Judgment, by default, for amounffc with costs. Henry Kamsay v. John Davidson. —Claim, L2, money lent, Mrs Ramsay, wife of plaintiff said that she had frequently asked defendant for the money, and that three weeks ago he acknowledged the. debt, and promised to pay it. He had not done so. Defendant disputed liability, stating that he received the money now sued for, on behalf of his father. Judgment for amount with costs.

Pemberton v. Hunter. —Claim LIO, for damage done to plaintiffs property on the Peninsula by trespass of defendant’s cattle on the sth and 6th inst. Mr Wilson appeared for plaintiff, and My Haggitt for defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, se, together with costs L 4 la.

Keligher v. Barker.—'l bis was in ansvycr to a fraud summons, the defendant being called upon to say why he had not paid L 6 14s, for which judgment had been given against him. The summons was dismissed. Davis v. Mureott. LIO I4s 7d, being balance due on a butcher’s account. Mr W. W. Wilson appeared for plaintiff, and Mr Harris for defendant. The sum of L 3 Ss lid was paid into Court. Judgment for the amount paid into Court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18721223.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3072, 23 December 1872, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
378

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. This Day. Evening Star, Issue 3072, 23 December 1872, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. This Day. Evening Star, Issue 3072, 23 December 1872, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert