DISTRICT COURT.
Monday, February 19
(Before His Honor District Judge Hardcastle.) CIVIL CASES. Batley v. Smith aud AValker. — Claim £103 15s Id. Judgment Avas given for £156 lis Id, AY'ith costs, against Smith, the affidavit of sendee of summons on AValker not being returned. Mr McLean represented the plaintiff. Tareha's executors a-. Metherell.—Claim £100. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs £7 19s. Mr Lascelles for the plaintiffs. I-loadley, Lyon and Co. v. Hapuka.— Claim £62 3s 3d. Judgment for amount claimed with costs. Mr Lascelles for the plaintiffs. Rolfe v. Hariwera.—Claim £190 for cuttin" greenstone. Mr Lasccllcs for the plaintiff, and Mr Lee for the defendant. Evidence having been taken the case A\-as adjourned until next morning in order that a question might be decided respecting the translation into Maori of the summons sent to the .defendant.
This Day
At 11 o'clock His Honor, having disposed of the question raised re translation of summons in the case of Rolfe v. Hariwera, gave
judgment for the plaintiff for £150, Avith costs £2 lis, expenses of two Avitnesses 19s, counsel's fee £7 10s, and interpreter's fee £3 3s, less £10 paid into Court. The Court avus then adjourned nine die.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DTN18830220.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 3622, 20 February 1883, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
198DISTRICT COURT. Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 3622, 20 February 1883, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in