Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COMMUNIST CLAIMS

Defence In “Daily Worker” Case LONDON, May 1. Mr. D. N. Pritt, K.C.,' opening for the defence in the “Daily Worker” libel action, said the case was important because it involved the serious question as to whether the use of the law’ of libel endangered the right of the Press or anyone else to utter legitimate criticism. The Communists claimed that they were consistently and strongly an antiFascist party and sincerely desired to get rid of Hitler and Hitler’s Fascism, but did not think this was possible by carrying on war. They believed that the detestable regime in Germany could only be defeated from the inside. Mr. Pritt submitted that the articles in the “Daily Worker” ■were fair comment.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19400503.2.53.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 186, 3 May 1940, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
121

COMMUNIST CLAIMS Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 186, 3 May 1940, Page 9

COMMUNIST CLAIMS Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 186, 3 May 1940, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert