BEAUTIFUL LACE
Once More Highly Valued It is the American woman wbo goes in now for collecting fine specimens of old lace, and really understands and appreciates the stitches characteristic of different districts, writes 11. Pearl Adam in "The Observer.” After all, she lias not had it handed down to her through her family, and still looks tipon it as a very wonderful tiling. Undoubtedly it is. Of all the luxury arts invented and practised by man, lace-making is probably the most delicate and the most refined. It is a pity that our Englishwomen should lose their understanding of and love for anything so beautiful. Fashion will probably bring it back before long, and then there will be a different tale to tell Princess Marina’s veil may do quite a good deal '-owards bringing back real lace into favour. However, the present-day girl is not interested in needlework, so she cannot appreciate the work and the artistry that went into the making of real lace. She is just as well satisfied with the machine-made kind, and doesn’t know the difference in design or workmanship. In this she loses a very great pleasure. The drawer or box in which the lace is stored affords to the understanding owner a pleasure every whit as great as that which a miser feels in contemplating his gold, and infinitely more desirable, in that she can take it out and wear it without depreciating it. without losing it. and without indulging her sou! in a pleasure so base as that of moneygrabbing. The Old Days. The bridal outfit of lace in old days consisted of a square veil, which was worn over the face, but brides nowadays arc too easily contented with a square or length of tulle or embroidered net. These cost anything from a mere 35 shillings to eight or nine guineas, They are usually white, but there is an occasional demand for pale blue or pink, when they have to be dyed. In this case, naturally, they are not meant to be worn over the face. Not even the most blushing bride would care for the effect on her complection of a veil of pale blue before it. The over-the-face veil went out just about the time of the war, when, according to crabbed uncles and aunts, modesty also became dowdy.
One can hardly understand why brides should disdain anything so beautiful as a lace veil. When Princess Stephanie of Belgium was married
about 50 years ago, she wore a square of lace which bad taken seven or eight years to make. Marie Antoinette was married in Point d’Alencon, which had been many a long year in the making, but this is rather an unhappy example to cite. 200-year-old Veil. There is in existence a wedding veil two hundred years old, of Brussels applique. it is five feet square. The net was made by hand in narrow strips, and the veil was paid for according to the numlter of shillings which could be placed along the strip. This was all made by hand, appliqued with tiny flowers and a strengthening border. It is only worth a fifth to-day of its actual value, because of the slump in the demand for old lace. Fifty years ago the great ladies of England and France would not be seen without lace, nor be satisfied with anything but the real article. Times have changed since the days when a veil was sent to Princess Mary, daughter of George 111, in an enormous wrapping, bearing the injection: “By the coach, May 23, 181 G. Not to be bent, and delivered immediately Keep dry.” It is a thousand pities that the many uses to which real lace can lie put should be neglected, and one is looking forward to the return of so very becoming and elegant a fashion. If Queen Mary would express her own liking for real lace by wearing it, the day of that return would be nearer.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19350123.2.19.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 101, 23 January 1935, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
663BEAUTIFUL LACE Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 101, 23 January 1935, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.