Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CASE OF MRS. FARR

Sydney, July 21. Dr. Thompson, referring to Mr. M'Tiernan’s reply to the deputation, explains that the reports suggest that Mrs. Farr is endeavouring to evade her obligations, but the Public Trustee has her estate, and refuses to give it up. Furthermore, ho has sworn statements by three Crown Ministers that the inquiry cost the applicant nothiing.—Press Assu.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210722.2.54

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 255, 22 July 1921, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
62

THE CASE OF MRS. FARR Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 255, 22 July 1921, Page 5

THE CASE OF MRS. FARR Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 255, 22 July 1921, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert