Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

Reserved judgment was delivered by llr. Justice Chapman in the Supreme Court on Saturday in an action brought by Frederick Richardson, contractor, oj Wellington, against tho Waiapu County Council. This ease, which was heard in Gisborne, arose out of a dispute in respect to the making of a road in the Waiapu. County.'.The amount of the tender was £9954, and it . was claimed that extra work brought the amount up to a very much larger sum. The main point at issue was that plaintiff contended that the contract was taken out of his hands by the County Council in terms of a letter signed by plaintiff. The jury found that the worii could have been done for less money than that which it. actually cost, and found a verdict for a substantial sum in favour of plaintiff, representing the difference between the contract pi-ice aud that which it ought, to have, cost tho County Council to complete. It was contended by the defendant council that under the contract the discretion of the County Engineer as to the cost of the work was 'absolute, and in the absence of fraud could not lie questioned by the jury. His Honour,'after'ruling iu favour of the defendants oil certain points raised, requested counsel to try and arrive at an agreement in rcspecfc olv some of the items in the, claim. Mr. C. P. Skerrctt appeared for. plaintiff, and Mr. T. W. Hislop for defendants.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19161218.2.90

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 2954, 18 December 1916, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
242

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 2954, 18 December 1916, Page 11

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 2954, 18 December 1916, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert