BLENHEIM CASE.
Ptt ER BO YITOS bO TO LAW On '-itwrdaj merrujif, in Hip 11 o Court liib floiiciu the Ci lef J« tie (Mr Robert btout; hoi I arguim-nt re spr tmg an api'i won b\ i)o Sjj iijf; {reck Huei Board to pntoico an m jui ct ji agnnbi, ihc Lo»n \Wriu ],{i r Bonrd lyimst tl>° loiwumnci. of a yojne in Ihc bed of the V ur m r \ er It uib stated tint ihis groMic Ind tho eficrfc oi jirnPiHbig \ alir tiom Homily into tho Op-iiva ltn» £T;s Ikmom lr 1 inspected tho fa round -u i tiled ]ii coitlusiohs on iott "Ui M rrett Ivt , with Mr Rogers, appcir d for
tho Spring Creek River Beard, and Mr. .M. Myers, with Mr, Mills, for tho Uovfer Waintu River Board. After the legal position bad been argued, His Honour reserved judgment.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140608.2.66.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2170, 8 June 1914, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145BLENHEIM CASE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2170, 8 June 1914, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in