Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE.

STRONG REMARKS FROM THE BENCH. (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) Reefton, November 21. In a licensing case heard before the Stipendiary Magistrate to-day, of serving liquor to hoys under 21, his Worship fined a barmaid and the son of the licensee £5, reserving judgment on tho licensee's case. Mr. Hewitt, 5.M.,. strongly condemned two boys, Horton and Lecher, whose statements to tho police directly, contradicted their evidence, and who admitted that the statements were fabricated. Tho magistrate ordered the sergeant of police to endeavour to institute proceedings for perjury against the lads, and characterised the change of statements to the police and the evidence given in Court in these cases as disgusting, and the lads en liars.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19121122.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1604, 22 November 1912, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
117

CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1604, 22 November 1912, Page 4

CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1604, 22 November 1912, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert