MISUNDERSTOOD.
DK. M'ARTHUR, S.M., AND "NO 5 ORDERS." 1 ' ] "I have heard once or twice," said. j Dr. M'Arthur, S.M., in the' Magistrate's t Court yesterday, "that it is said that t I have given it out that I will not , make an order on a judgment summons I against any man who is getting under £1 a week. Needless to Bay, I made no \ such statement at all. I would have t taken no notice of it, only I find that a fellow magistrate down south' has ; quoted my words, or my supposed words. Mr. C. R. Dix: It was in the newspapers hero. Dr. M'Arthur: In tho newspapers! I don't know how it got there. Mr. Dix: Yes; something you said in Auckland. Dr. M'Arthur: Something I said in Auckland! Mr. Dix: Yes; something you said in a jocular way—on tho Appeal Board. Dr. M'Arthur: Oh, now I know what they were referring to. I said: "If you had shown mo that your income—you must take all a man's circumstances into consideration—didn't amount to £i I probably would not have made an order." The man had I don't know how many children—l would bo sorry to say hoir many. =
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120327.2.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1399, 27 March 1912, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
201MISUNDERSTOOD. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1399, 27 March 1912, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in