Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MINERS' RELIEF FUNDS.

Sir,— Referring to the article in your issue of the 16th instant.'under the heading ■ "Miners' Relief Funds." ' The article in question gives a totally incorrect idea regarding these funde. In cases of personal injury an employee in a coal-mirio is entitled to, and receives; the same rate of compensation us an injured worker in any other industry. A word of explanation is necessary as to the coal-miners' relief funds. These funds are established under the CoalMines' Act, which provides that every 'bituminous coal-mine-owner shall pay to the credit of the fund a sum equivalent to id. per ton/oh all coal.sold from that mine. No contributions to the funds are received from any other source, so it will be SE-on that the fund is provided solely by the coal-mine owners. When anemployee in a coal-mine is injured lie receives tho full amount of compensation provided by tha WorkersCompensation Act. The amount payable is ascertained as laid down in that Act, namely, one r half of the average weekly wa"fs, and the amount: :s made up and paid partly by contribution from the coal-miners' relief fund and partly by direct contribution from tho mineownor. An example will perhaps make this clear. ■

A worker whoso averatfo wages wore £1 weekly would be entitled under tho Workers'* Compensation Act, in cases of injury, to compensation at tho raus' of. £.1 per week. If he were an employee in a coal-mine he would receive that amount per week, made up by a contribution of 12s. 6d.. per week .from tho miners' relief fund, and 2is. Gd. per week from the coal-mine owner. 1 cannot seo that any injustice is committed by this procedure. The amendment now proposed certainly will inflict an injustice—on the coal-mine-owner-in that lie would be compelled to pay 12s. Cd. more per week for compensation than is the case m auy other industry. And be it note:! that the coal-mining industry is already penalised in having to deposit part compensation in advance in anticipation of possible uccidenta, which deposit is required in no'other industry. This is a very fair sample of the harsh manner in which important, industries are being hampered by the Government, resulting in people and capital being driven away from the country.— lam,etC - ' MINE OWNER.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100820.2.87.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 900, 20 August 1910, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
379

MINERS' RELIEF FUNDS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 900, 20 August 1910, Page 10

MINERS' RELIEF FUNDS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 900, 20 August 1910, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert