Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SLAUGHTERING LICENSE.

e THE BJNKS MEAT COMPANY. A representative deputation of master butchers waited upon the Mayor and the members of the Abattoirs Committee yesterday afternoon, with a request that the Banks Meat Co., 'Ltd., be granted a renewal of its slaughtering license. Mr. Dickinson, of the firm of Dickinson Brothers, was the principal speaker, and in presenting a largely-sighed petition in. support of the deputation's request, pointed out that the Banks Company had gone to considerable expense in erecting up-to-date abattoirs on its own property, and had consistently supplied Govern-ment-inspected meat to its clients. The main objection to the closing-down of the company's abattoirs was the fact that the smaller butchers would only have one source of meat supply—the Wellington Meat . Export Company—instead, of, two, as at present. With two sources of supply,, it was felt that reasonable rates would prevail. The closing-down of one of -these sources of supply would create an undesirable, monopoly. Councillor G. Shirtcliffe said that ht knew of no other'community, possessing a public abattoir, which permitted the existence of a private slaughtering-house similar to that owned by the Banks Company. He doubted whether the closingdown of this particular abattoir would create a monopoly, as had been suggested. Would it not be possible for the small traders to get their supplies from the bigger firms? (A member of the deputation: We would be worse off than ever,). The Banks Meat Company was carrying on a slaughtering business in contravention of the Act. . Replying to the deputation, the Mayor said that the matter had been referred to Mr.'C. P. Skerrett, for a legal opinion on the issues involved. Until that came to 'hand, it would, of course, bo impossible to come to a definite decision one way or another. He thanked the deputation* for its attendance, for the views expressed by the various speakers, who were experts on this particular question, had been most helpful.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100715.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 869, 15 July 1910, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
319

SLAUGHTERING LICENSE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 869, 15 July 1910, Page 4

SLAUGHTERING LICENSE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 869, 15 July 1910, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert