Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Licensing Act

Sir, —Electors of intellect must wonder why our politicians allow and enforce an antiquated and patched Licensing Act. Breaches of the act always make headline news. Fancy a father and brother of a licensee charged with “being illegally on the premises.” A New Zealander’s home is his castle unless he holds a hotel licence. An Auckland licensee was acquitted, but now faces charges for the same offence under another section. Truly the act is a travesty of the Common Law right of innocence until proved guilty. Is a hotel able to hold a cabaret and serve food without a permit if liquor is not involved?—Yours, etc., B. LOGICAL. [“Section 164 of the Licensing Act, 1908, says: ‘lf any licensed person permits any room or portion of his licensed premises to be used as a dancing, concert or theatrical saloon he shall be liable to forfeit his licence’,” said Chief Inspector E. J. C. Hay, ActingSuperintendent of Police at Christchurch, when this letter was referred to him. Chief Inspector Hay then quoted Section 67 (3) of the Licensing Amendment Act, 1948, and Section 41 (2) of the Licensing Amendment Act, 1953. The former says: “The Licensing Control Commission may from time to time in its discretion exempt the holder of any tourist-house licence from the provisions of Section 164 of the principal act in so far as they relate to dancing, concerts, or theatrical entertainments ...” The section in the 1953 amendment says: “Where at any time before or after the passing of this act a publican’s licence or an accommodation licence has been granted in respect of any accommodation house or guest house or private hotel the Licensing Control Commission may from time to time exempt the holder of the licence from the provisions of Section 164 of the principal act so far as they relate to dancing, concerts or theatrical entertainments if the Commission is satisfied the premises will continue to be used substantially for the accommodation of tourists and no, other facilities in the locality are reasonably available for the enjoyment by the guests of the things to which the exemption relates.”]

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19570507.2.15.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume XCV, Issue 28270, 7 May 1957, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
355

Licensing Act Press, Volume XCV, Issue 28270, 7 May 1957, Page 3

Licensing Act Press, Volume XCV, Issue 28270, 7 May 1957, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert