Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHITE BUTTERFLY PEST

♦ HOPE OF GENERAL CONTROL LIBERATION OF PARASITES IN CANTERBURY BEGUN With the liberation of parasites to deal with the white butterfly at Timaru la%t week, the war against this pest was begun in Canterbury, and it was carried a stage further yesterday when there were liberations in Heathcote. It is hoped that later in the week there will be further liberations in the Kaikoura district. The parasites are insects which have been imported from Europe, and have been distributed by the Government entomologist at Palmerston North. The insects lay their eggs on the caterpillar of the butterfly, and when the eggs hatch, the young insects feed on the caterpillar on which they were' born. About 11,000 of the insects were liberated in the Timaru district on the property of Mr George Benstead, and yesterday the liberations at Heathcote numbered about 8000. Mr R. McGillivray stated yesterday that when he visited Kaikoura last week he found that considerable damage had been done to rape and similar crops there. He hoped to be able to liberate as many as 15,000 in those districts very soon.

Mr McGillivray, who is Fields Superintendent of the Department of Agriculture, also mentioned that he did not hope for a complete destruction of the white butterfly, but was confident of a considerable control of its ravages. When a pest of that sort became at all established, it was unlikely that any steps that were taken would eradicate it altogether. Much of the damage to crops and vegetables that was being at present attributed to the caterpillar of the white butterfly was really the work of other pests, and the butterfly was being blamed for much damage that it was not responsible for. The Department of Agriculture had received many complaints of destruction from farmers and residents, that on inspection proved to have been caused by other insects, and on many occasions the flowers and plants that had been damaged were of a kind never attacked by the white butterfly. The possibilities of sparrovq attacking the white butterflies was also mentioned by Mr McGillivray yesterday. He stated that reports had been received that this was the case, but he had not yet seen proof of it.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19350305.2.41

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21414, 5 March 1935, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
371

WHITE BUTTERFLY PEST Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21414, 5 March 1935, Page 9

WHITE BUTTERFLY PEST Press, Volume LXXI, Issue 21414, 5 March 1935, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert