Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"A NEW ZEALAND COMPOSITION"

Sir,-May I point out to A, D. Heenan that in his letter to you under the above heading in The Listener of July 12, he said nothing at all to rebut my criticism of Miss Pollard’s work? He did succeed, however, in being very boorish and rude -no doubt the result of writing in anger. Having stated, evidently to his own satisfaction, that I do not possess either of the qualities requisite-on the quoted authority of Leslie Orrey-for the prac-

tice of musical criticism: viz., facility with the pen, and insight into the spirit of music, Mr, Heenan asks me to inform him on what grounds I base my ¢laims. to be a music critic. Well, Sir, I think you will agree that this is a very awkward question for me to answer without seeming egotistical. I would much rather refer Mr. Heenan to such authorities in New Zealand as Dr. Vernon Griffiths, Lecturer in Music at Canterbury University College; Dr. Edgar Bainton, the former Director of Sydney Conservatorium of Music, who is visiting this country; Mr. Alan Mulgan, whose impending retirement from the NBS we have all heard of with deepest regret; or abroad, to Dr. Malcolm Sargent, who paid me a very high compliment when he was here some years ago; Eric Coates, Frederick Lamond,. Mark. Hambourg, Egon Petri, and the late Sir Henry, Wood, a friend of long standing, I could cite several more examples, sir, but these will suffice. Finally, sir, with further reference to the matter of Miss Pollard’s composition, allow me to point out a fact too often overlooked by champions of the modern musical-or, rather, un-musical -idiom; namely, that the basic essential of any kind of music is that it shall be pleasing to the ear. Mere cleverness on paper is frequently mistaken for

musicianship, whereas that means nothing whatsoever. Music is primarily intended to be listened to, and if it fail to satisfy aurally, it is ipso facto not true music. Most emphatically, Miss Pollard’s. work does ‘not. pass thie vital

test.

L. D.

AUSTIN

(Wellington),

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19460726.2.14.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 370, 26 July 1946, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

"A NEW ZEALAND COMPOSITION" New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 370, 26 July 1946, Page 5

"A NEW ZEALAND COMPOSITION" New Zealand Listener, Volume 15, Issue 370, 26 July 1946, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert