THE JEWS AND HOLLYWOOD
"SPEAKING CANDIDLY INDEED: An Open Letter to Gordon Mirams."’ Bertie Heymann. Public Relations. Committee, Council of Weilington Jewry.
(Reviewed by
K. J.
Sheen
T was inevitable that Mr. Mirams’ remarks in his book Speaking Candidly on the influence of Hollywood’s Jews upon American films should lead to controversy. He, I think, courted it. So that it is no surprise to read Mrs. Heymann’s reply. What is surpfising is the relatively calm and intelligent tone of the argument upon such a prejudiceclouded issue. It is the very model of what controversy should be in a civilised world. Feeling, which is strong, never over-rides courtesy and there is every acknowledgment of the other’s sincerity. The kernel of G.M.’s_ argument was. that the Jewish producer, . predominant in Hollywood, has _ influenced Hollywood films in certain undesirable ways through certain evil tendencies inherent in Jewish culture, including "lack of social consciousness," a
"basic sensuousness," and a different ethical outlook from the Christian. Mrs. Heymann eloquently and convincingly defends the claim of Jewish culture as she defines it, and has no difficulty in repudiating G.M.’s sweeping generalisation on its tendencies. Her strictures upon his quotations from an anonymous Jewish author seem also fair and decisive. One unsatisfactory fedture, however, is that her definition of culture as a set of values produced by a people in a conscious effort towards improvement is rather arbitrary, and she seems to have somewhat misjudged the intention and scope of G.M.’s argument, in which "culture" is used in a more familiar, looser, way. The contradition in terms, for example, of which she accuses G.M, for his phrase "the worst elements in Jewish culture" is only a contradition in terms of her own definition. She comes closer to the heart of the matter at issue when she says: "Jewish culture, the principles of Judaism have nothing to do... . with the fact that some (or even many) of the film magnates are Jews. ... They are the product or perhaps the embodiment of our time which has put profit above achievement, pleasure above happiness 4. ete." This is very true and much more important than the mere historical fact, which, incidentally, she might have taken the trouble to explain, that the typical Hollywood film nroducer is a Jew.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19460329.2.23.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 353, 29 March 1946, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
378THE JEWS AND HOLLYWOOD New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 353, 29 March 1946, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Material in this publication is protected by copyright.
Are Media Limited has granted permission to the National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Mātauranga o Aotearoa to develop and maintain this content online. You can search, browse, print and download for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Are Media Limited for any other use.
Copyright in the work University Entrance by Janet Frame (credited as J.F., 22 March 1946, page 18), is owned by the Janet Frame Literary Trust. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this article and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the New Zealand Listener. You can search, browse, and print this article for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from the Janet Frame Literary Trust for any other use.
Copyright in the Denis Glover serial Hot Water Sailor published in 1959 is owned by Pia Glover. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise this serial and make it available online as part of this digitised version of the Listener. You can search, browse, and print this serial for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Pia Glover for any other use.