Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"WORDS."

Sir,-May I congratulate you on your excellent editorial "Words." I notice that a correspondent, "Anti-Humbug," objects to it. He says that democracy and communism are different systems, Now if a majority in a democracy votes for communism (in the French parliament the communists, though not in the majority, are, the biggest party), it immediately ceases to be a democracy according to "A.H." They must vote anti-communist in order to stay democratic. Is not that, among many other things, "sham and mockery"? Although "A.H." stresses that Lincoln did not mention economics in his definition of democracy, "A.H." confuses (perhaps pufposely), political

constitutions (i.e., democracy, dictatote ship, monarchy, etc.) and economic sys« tems (i.e., communist, liberal, and conservative). The two are completely independent, a communist democracy being quite ‘as possible as-a conservative dictatorship. No answer is negessary to "A.H.’s" sneering remarks about Russian freedom of discussion on farms and their approximate economic equality. I have talked to a man who worked in a Russian factory for five years and whose opinion is worth more to me than that of Messrs. White and Johnston, although he did not get thousands of dollars to write a book. "A.H.’s" remarks about Balkan elections are taken from newspaper headlines. He does not mention the subsequent reports appearing in small print, that in the Hungarian ‘elections the small-holders’ party (the conservatives) won right under the Russians’ noses, the commune ists polling less than 20 per cent. Nor does he state that in British-held Greece there are strong protests against unfait ‘election proceedings, If "A.H.". strongly advocates free elections. in the Atlantic Charter spirit for Eastern Europe, why does he not da so for India and Indonesia? Will he dare to say that Asiatics are inferior peoples?, That argument of "race superiority," which is the only one he can possibly give, sounds very much like that of a certain other A.H., and if "Anti-Hum. bug" resorts to it (his "democratic" cover only hiding his strong nationalism) he should more rightly be called Anti«

Human Bug.

H.P.

R.

(Lower Hutt).

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.I whakaputaina aunoatia ēnei kuputuhi tuhinga, e kitea ai pea ētahi hapa i roto. Tirohia te whārangi katoa kia kitea te āhuatanga taketake o te tuhinga.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZLIST19460111.2.13.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 342, 11 January 1946, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
342

"WORDS." New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 342, 11 January 1946, Page 5

"WORDS." New Zealand Listener, Volume 14, Issue 342, 11 January 1946, Page 5

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert