Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FIXED INCOME

AND COST OP LIVING HIGHER TAXES AND PRICES The Prime Minister, In his recent review of economic conditions in New Zealand, defended the existing high level of taxation, and said that more than half the amount which is obtained from taxation is handed straight back to the people in social services (says a statement by the Associated Chambers of Commerce of New Zealand). The matter is not altogether one of simple and satisfactory transfer such as that. The availability to the people of the social services which the State provides does not give them the extra means with which to purchase food and clothing and other living necessities—things now costing more than previously, owing in part to high taxation falling on the consumer in increased living costs. Workers have been given higher wages in an attempt to increase their purchasing power, but we have already shown that these wage increases, when related to the more rapidly growing cost of living, have given the great majority of industrial workers an “ effective ” margin of only approximately .6 per cent, (less when direct taxation increases on the individual are deducted, and 'less still to those workers working short time). Then there are those in the community who are entirely dependent on fixed incomes, whether from personal effort, or from investments, mortgages, rents, annuities, superannuation or any other source. These persons receive no benefit, from the increased wages shorter working hours, while their incomes, not having increased in size, have consequently received the full impact of the increased cost of living. Owing to the shrinkage in their purchasing power, they are able to buy less. The actual increases in the cost of living which they have had to face, without any increase in their incomes, are as follow:

OOST OP LIVING INCREASE PER CENT. OVER 1935

These percentages are compiled from the Government’s own published statistics. There are those people, therefore, whose purchasing power is considerably reduced as compared with 1935, owing in part to the effect of high taxation on the cost of living. They may pay no income tax, but they cannot escape the high prices which taxation brings.

Nov. Feb. May Aug. Nov. Feb. 1936 1937 1937 1937 1937 1938 Food: 7.9 9.7 13.9 14.4 20.0 17.9 Rent: 5.4 5.9 6.5 7.2 8.0 8.7 Fuel and light: 4.3 4.7 6.2 7.4 8.6 8.7 Clothing. Drapery, Footwear: 3.1 6.7 10.0 12.2 13.2 13.6 Miscellaneous: 2.5 6.2 7.4 8.2 8.7 8.3 All groups combined: 5.4 7.2 9.8 10.7 1 3.1 12.6

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19380517.2.14

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 122, Issue 20500, 17 May 1938, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
420

FIXED INCOME Waikato Times, Volume 122, Issue 20500, 17 May 1938, Page 4

FIXED INCOME Waikato Times, Volume 122, Issue 20500, 17 May 1938, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert