Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT AUDITED.

LAW SOCIETY ACTION.

AGAINST WELLINGTON SOLICITOR. “MOST SERIOUS NEGLECT.” (By Telegraph.—Press Association.) WELLINGTON, Friday. Proceedings brought by the New Zealand Law Society against George Mackay, solicitor, of Wellington, for having failed to have his trust account audited up to March 31, 1929, cmac before the Court of Appeal this morning. Mr Von Haast, who appeared with Mr Free for the Law Society, said the Court would see from the affidavits that the practitioner had failed to have his trust account audited, and had been fined £SO for such. The Law Society communicated with him, and he promised to have an audit undertaken, but took no steps until about the commencement of the present session of the Court of Appeal. An audit had now been filed, hut only up to March 31 last.

The Chief Justioe here pointed out that under the Law Practitioners’ Amendment and Soldiers’ Fidelity Guarantee Fund Act the Law Society had power to insist on an audit up to date.

Mr D. ML Findlay, who represented Mackay, said he understood that Mackay had done practically nothing for some months past. The amount to the credit of the trust account at March 31 was £2 8s Bd. It was quite well known that he had not been attending to his practice, and his neglect to reply to the Law Society’s requisition was in accordance with this neglect of the whole of his work. The auditor had recently informed him that everything was now in order. Mr Findlay now requested that the Court should deal with the matter immediately and dispose of it, as Mackay was practically out of practice. The Chief Justice remarked that it was the most serious neglect, and was censurable in the highest degree. He said the Court would indicate its view of the matter on Monday or Tuesday.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19300329.2.83

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume 107, Issue 17982, 29 March 1930, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
306

NOT AUDITED. Waikato Times, Volume 107, Issue 17982, 29 March 1930, Page 9

NOT AUDITED. Waikato Times, Volume 107, Issue 17982, 29 March 1930, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert