RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT NGARUAWHIA.
McCarthy v. Sunderland and Potter.— Mr Dyer appeared for the plaintiff and Mr O'Neill for the defendants. This caso was in part heard at a previous court. Plaintiff claimed £100 for work done. For the defence evidence was given that the major part of tho work hud been douu for Messrs Potter aud Sunderland junrs., and not for the defendants. Defendants also pleaded a set off.—Verdict for the plaintiff for £1 15s and costs.
Harsant v. Guthrie.— This was also an adjourned case which was advanced a stage by the examination of James Gall, and again adjourned till next court on account of illneßS of the defendant. Mr Swarbrick (for Air Hay) for the plaintiff, aud Mi O'Neill for the defendant.
McCabty v. MoKiNNON Buns.—This was a claim for wages—£l 12s less £2 I s money paid—Mr Dyer for plaintiff, Mr Swarbrick (for Mr Hay) for defendant. The evidence for tho defence showed that the plaintiff was not in tho service of defendant, but was sent by his employer to assist. —The plaintiff was nonsuited with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18910409.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXXVI, Issue 2923, 9 April 1891, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
181RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT NGARUAWHIA. Waikato Times, Volume XXXVI, Issue 2923, 9 April 1891, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in