RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, CAMBRIDGE.
Yesterday.— (Before Mr iNorthcroft, R.M.) JonGMKNT Summonses.— Bremner v Campbell, and Collins v Campbell, were struck out of the list, on the application of Mr Dyer for plaintiffs. MoCall v F. Kendall, £GB.—Mr Dyer for plaintiff. Defendant deposed that he was working for Mr Gardner, of Rukuhia, and that the only remuneration lie received was his food. He was cross-examined at longth by Mr Dyer, and also by the Court, but stuck to his statement that he was working for his " tucker"' only. The R.M. cautioned him that if Mr Gaidner proved that he was receiving any other remuneration besides his food, he would be committed for perjury, but defendant still adhered to his statement. The Court ordered him to pay 10s. per week ; tlie first payment to be made on the 20th inst. No order was made for imprisonment in default. Ordinary Summonses. — Chambers v. Moore, claim £l(i 15s. Judgment for plaintiff with costs £2 (is.—Hewitt v. W. TI. Pattison, claim £5 7s (id. Judgment for plaintiff with costs £1 17s.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18880114.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXX, Issue 2420, 14 January 1888, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
176RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, CAMBRIDGE. Waikato Times, Volume XXX, Issue 2420, 14 January 1888, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.