NATIVE LAND COURT, CAMBRIDGE.
. Wednksdw — (Before hiri Honour Judge , O'Biien.) ■■ Succession Claims- • Ix No. 1 claim. ILirc Bidois to succeed Henare m Okauia No. 3, order was mado in favour of M.iri.i I3idois and Henaro Bidon, applicant's trustees. In No. 4 claim, P.irata To Mapu to succeed Wairaki in Ok.iina No. 4, order was made in favour of applicant's two children, > and Parapi Mapu and N^iroiuaki l'araone ; as trustees. i No. ."i claim, P.ir.ita Te Mi|tu to succeed W.irjiki in Okauia No. 3. Order was mado 1 in favour of the same trustees, on behalf of tho same children. No. 3 claim, Rehn, Aper.ihama Tukurn Whompohue to succeed Ngatipnra, was dibini.s.scd. No. H claim, RiMia Apeiahama to succeed Aperahama To Huiio.a, in Okauia No. 4. After .i lorift lieaimg, and much conflicting evidence, tho case was dismissed. Tlib Court \v.ii occupied ySstcrdny, hearing other succession cl.um-*.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18851210.2.21
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2095, 10 December 1885, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
146NATIVE LAND COURT, CAMBRIDGE. Waikato Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2095, 10 December 1885, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in