Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Civil Cases. (Before Mr H. W. Northcroft, R.M., and Mr E. B. Walker, J.P.)

R. Wright v. Minehera Powha.— Claim £37 4s 6(1 ; judgment debt. Mr Kecsing for plaintiff, Mr Campbell for the debtor. The plaintiff urged, as the debtor's ability to pay, that he had a claim in certain lands which had passed through the court. He was fully satisfied chat the debtor was a grantee in the Waotu Block, nnd received revenue from the WaiUato Timber Company. His Worship did not consider that this was sufficient proof. The phintiff would have to prove the debtor's ability to the court. MrKeesing applied for an adjournment for two months, that he might in the meantime to secure the necessary proof of the debtor's ability to meet the judgment of the couit. Adjournment granted. Stuart v. R. Wright.— Claim £1 16s, judgment debt. Mr Campbell for plaintiff. The defendant said he was unavoidably detained out of court when judgment was given, otherwise, had he been able to attend, he could have proved to the satisfaction of the court that he was not indebted to the plaintiff for the amount claimed. His Worship regretted the ciicu instance, but was unable to go back on the judgment of the court. Ordered to pay the whole amount on or before the Ist June, with costs, 15a. Bates v. Boddam.— Claim £1 12s. Mr Campbell for plaintiff. No appeirance of defendant. Judgment for amount, and costs £1 6s. Rites v. Napier.— Claim £7 15a. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for plaintiff for amount, and £1 14s 6d cost?. Hunter and Co. v. Thomas Bell. — Claim £11 10s 2d. Mr Campbell for plaintiff. Judgment for amount, and costs £2 10a.Bates v. Te Rei.r^Clajm £3 2s Gd. Mr Campbell for plaintiff. Judgment for amount, with costs ■£{ IQs.fld. , Hoy v, Kaea. —Claim ~£9 IDs. Mr Campbell for plaintiff. Judgment for amouur.find costs £2 12,6 d. , R. Wright v. Natana^-Claim £13 18s 10(1., This wa? on application by the defendant for a new. trial. Application granted, to be heard on the 27th Jane prox.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18840531.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1857, 31 May 1884, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
345

Civil Cases. (Before Mr H. W. Northcroft, R.M., and Mr E. B. Walker, J.P.) Waikato Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1857, 31 May 1884, Page 2

Civil Cases. (Before Mr H. W. Northcroft, R.M., and Mr E. B. Walker, J.P.) Waikato Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1857, 31 May 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert