RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURT, HAMILTON.
Wednesday. — (Before Mr H. W. Northcroft, R.M.) CIVIL CAKES. J. Harker v. MaTHIAS. —Claim £1 for reward offeied for the lecoveiy of a dog. The defence was that defendant had had to pay 2-, for taking the dog over to Raglan, and that he offered the b.dance, 18s, to plaintiff. The Magistiato held tliat all the plaintiff wab lequned by the adveitisement to do was to take the dog to Johnson's stable. This had been done, and judgment must go foi plaintiff, w ith costs 18s. Gaudin v. Gresham. — Claim £2 18b C>d for boaid, lodging, and buggy hue. The defence was that the liability had been incieased dunng the time defendant was attending the District Couit conducting a case for defendant. It was usual to chaigo foi expenses, but in making out his bill to plaintift he had not done so. Judgment w.is given for defendant with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18840110.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1796, 10 January 1884, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
153RESIDENT MAGISTRATES' COURT, HAMILTON. Waikato Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1796, 10 January 1884, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in