Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE. NEWCASTLE HIGHWAY MATTERS.

TO THE EDITOR. Sib,— Will you, through the medium of your valuable journal, allow me to publish my views on a subject which is just now engaging the attention of the settlers and trustees of the Newcastle district. Some settlers, and the writer is one of them, think a large landowner has no more right to the lands of the Crown in the district than a small land-owner, and therefore the Board should not grant any privilege to one settler more than another in the depasturing cattle, on what is termed the run. The system in the past has been to allow five head to every fifty acres owned, giving a monopoly to the large land-owner. If we apply this, monopolising principle to other public property —our railways for instance— it? mconsia-

tency will appear at once. I hold that it would be just as reasonable to limit a settler's use of the railway as his use of the public run. This district has had some trouble in getting one of the heads, in the shape of proxy-voting, off this apocalyptic dragon, and an attempt will be made to decapitate this monopoly also. As our Road Board is more approachable now than in the past, I venture to throw out a suggestion with regard to our local public works. I conceive that if specifications for public works were published in the local journal, the outlay would be more than recovered by the advantage gained by putting a copy of the specification in the hand of each subscriber. This would facilitate healthy criticism of works being carried on, and compacts or rings between contractors and engineers would be more dangerous. For instance, a taxpayer going along a road with a paper containing a specification, and seeing a ditch that should be five feet deep, left at only one foot deep, it would rouse his suspicion of foul play. He comes to a bridge or culvert where the specification says the water is to be four feet below the bridge, and sees it only eighteen inches below, and shakes his head. I say no more ; the advantage of such a system must recommend itself. — I am, &c, Whatawhata. Whatawhata, August 23, 1881.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18810825.2.23

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XVII, Issue 1427, 25 August 1881, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

CORRESPONDENCE. NEWCASTLE HIGHWAY MATTERS. Waikato Times, Volume XVII, Issue 1427, 25 August 1881, Page 3

CORRESPONDENCE. NEWCASTLE HIGHWAY MATTERS. Waikato Times, Volume XVII, Issue 1427, 25 August 1881, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert