RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, HIMILTON.

Waikato Times, Volume XV, Issue 1237, 3 June 1880, Page 2

RE SID ENT MAGISTRA TE'S CO URT, HIMILTON .

Yr-iT.RTHY— (£ f-.i-u H \V. Northcroft J ( ] >l Ji.M., an 1 8 T. Soudon, E>q., J.P.;

BieAch of tliB Borough. Bye-laws. A B nee Su-tvi 1 w i- oil uircil with driving .1 ti ij iwv >•>•> the bn lye at. other than a walkum p icj. 31 r 0 X» ll appeived for the defence an I pltMil d ginl y, -.tiluiir (hit asMc Slitter ha.l ouly ii 1 oatiy airivod in the 'Ustii-.t a Mnall pen iity would meet the ( Us". S ryMii ".Icri )v>r,i, ivho prosecuted, slid the i)y-lu\>s hid only lately been p i-ss'od, ai-d notice boonls h.ning- the byl.tsvt, painted ou them had been erected at both end-, of the bridge. Defendant had beea "uamed by the toll collector, but uolvvitbs andnig h.s be drove over the u il'c on tii iJOth iilly. Nt a trot. He w.fs of opinion that the cisc called for lull pen tlty. Ilai ii ■ .lefendant been in Cuurl ho should have had much more to >a^ Tho 3t :gish-.4c said as }t[r Slitter was only a rju.-nt ani\ d lie would only intlufc a noiuiu ■! fine of ">^.

Unregisiere-l Dogs. Q.'orce Kelly .>ai' William Wheelan ple.uW multy to having' unregistered iluiTfc., and pi'iniittiuLf llumu to be at Lu-ge, umo each iineJ ')b aud co.-ts.

Ciyil Cases. Viucont an 1 vVriifhc v. J.imes Combes ; cli.m, Wo )0> oil. Air O Neil for tho jd.autiir, raid "\Tr ll.iy fur the defence, it nrpi'uel iio.u thi 1 evidence that a re(\ipj- hid b<\ i :_iwn t'» the defendant on srcitiii-r .111 odkr for money duo to him fiwiu iiio I> trough Connoil. This order \v -. not, <,t hod, henco the present action. Judmnent was uivtn for ti.e plaiuHtf for f ill Miuouiit aiid (jo-ts. (Jockhead v. Gr. Ivdly , tl.iim, «;1 11s 2d, judgment viuimoiis, A'ljouinod. Fulsli.un Y. Taylor ; Claim, C(i 7h (id, judgment summons. Tl\ o!i",n'!tl oi'dtT w.is to p.iy 30s per ni' ii'Ji. Uj'iioi" i>ow reduced to El per iiit'iitii, di t'oud tut stlkging that he was c^ut" uii-ibl*' to ]) iy the laryer sum.