CORRESPONDENCE.
+ [Our correspondence columns are impartially open to all, but \\v do not in any way identify ourselves with opinions expressed therein.]
TO THE EDITOB. DANCING Arc. 1K> — The letter of your mock-modest rorreaponclcnt in last issue— "An Observer " — is moat feeble. It is intended Evidently as a reply to my remarks in reply to " Mores," out I cannot see where the reply comes in. "An Observer" professes to be amused at my "argument from nature, " as he terms my reference to the responsive action of the legs to the tmic of dance music ; I fail to &cc anything "grotesque " in the argument. "An Observer " wanders away from the subject matter of the letter of "Mores" and of my last— namely, what " Mores call iniquities, in which he specially included dancing — and instead of confining himself to the moral aspect of the question, flies away on the tack as to whether dancing is a healthy exercise or not. This is mere begging the question, mere shirking. For delicate people, of course a ball-room is not the place, and they are foolish for health-sake to indulge in dancing and late hours. This is a self-evident fact, but has nothing to do with the question as to whether dancing is an iniqxucy. "An Observer" professes to be shocked and alarmed — apparently on account of his daughters— that arras should encircle the waists of ladies, ami believes " ft deal of trouble is induced through this modoni innovation." Modern 1 save the mark ! Why B.C. dan dug consisted of an entwining of amis and hands, aa '• Observer " would know had he travelled in the Eabt, and htuiJietl the old carvings, &t\, there ex taut. As to the Bible records of
dancing, I have nothing to do with them ; I do not remember having read a ball programme in the volume of Holy Writ ; perhaps "Observer" will kindly point out the passage or passages he refers to. " To the pure all things are pure," and it speaks little for " Au Observer " that the fact of a gentleman's arm being placed on a lady's waist shonld raise ideas of evil character. In conclusion, I will repeat what I insisted on in my last letter, namely, that it is the abmc and not the moderate indulgence in recreation which is wrong. — I am, &c., Mens Sana in Corpore Sano. Cambridge, 19th March, 1880.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18800320.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XIV, Issue 1206, 20 March 1880, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
396CORRESPONDENCE. Waikato Times, Volume XIV, Issue 1206, 20 March 1880, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.