CIVIL SIDE.
(Before W. N. Searancke, Eaq, R.M, and I. R. Vialou, Esq., J.P.) A. Potter v. Keith.— Claim, ££. Mi- Hay for.plaiutiff; Mr O'Neill for defendant. A set-off of £1 10s was put m, bat plaintiff disputed the sot-off. The accounts were a mixed entry of meat and work. Plaintiff admitted to one item of 16s that should have been credited ; the credit had been given on an account rendered to Mrs Keith m the shop, bat not entered m the books, hence the mistake. Verdict for plaintiff for amount. Paid into Court. In giving judgment, the Court said that if one omission of entries had been made others might be, and that one entry of 3s, sworn to by Mr Potter as not being m his hand writingyand by Mrs Keefe as written m her presence, was m the opinion of the Court m plaintiff's hand writing. ... .At the request of Mr Potter, the writing referred' to was impounded by the, Court, to T be produced for further investigation.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18780926.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Waikato Times, Volume XII, Issue 977, 26 September 1878, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170CIVIL SIDE. Waikato Times, Volume XII, Issue 977, 26 September 1878, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in