Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Sib, — You have received a good deal of correspondence re the railway terminus at Te Awamutu. lam sorry it should cause so much hard feeling m the di-trict. I do not write this m answer to any of your correspondents, as you know I have had nothing to do with any of them. I only wish to give my reasons for opposing the petition to have the station removed from where it is now laid out into Te Awamutu. I understand that, at the j time the line was being surveyed, Mr Stewart (the Government engineer) was instructed to examine a line into the ' township, which he did, and I was told \ \ by two parties — who had a conversation with Mr Stewart regarding the change — that he said it would make a difference m , distanco of between two and three milee,

and, even then, the station could not be m the township, on account of the deep I hollow at the back of the Public Hall, which would require an embankment of nearly forty feet high. Consequently, if the line was taken through the townsiup the station would have to be nearly a make i little difference to the township wS Slde l \™?* J*- B&J al8 <>- said he was laying oat the trunk linfe through the island, and he could not run it through Wn y . TftP * ear the! inc. I havo aiifoe been told that, some time previous to the survey being made, another engineer (I ft* w^°? *"« name )> on a tour througlh the Waikato, told some parties m Te Awamutu that the Une ought to run through and have the station m the township. As I have no pretension to any engineering ; ability, I have more faith ii Mr Stewart s report than the engineer who examines a line on horseback. No doubt, to have the station on this side £°SV c a benefit to me and all the luhikihi settlers, as the station would be so much nearer to us ; but a new survey means time, and a great deal of extra expense, and, m my opinion, it would end m the station remaining where it is now laid out, with a delay of six or twelve month., These are my reasons for opposing the petition, and I believe two-thirds ol the settlers interested would endorse them.— l am, etc., James Henoebson. Kihikihi, Feb. 22, 1878.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT18780228.2.9.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waikato Times, Volume XI, Issue 887, 28 February 1878, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
399

Untitled Waikato Times, Volume XI, Issue 887, 28 February 1878, Page 2

Untitled Waikato Times, Volume XI, Issue 887, 28 February 1878, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert