RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT.
MoxdaY, MaTiCH 4. (Before J. Giles, Esq., E.M~.) London v. Jones. Claim for £7 03 9i Judgment for .plaintiff, with costs 13s. £3 to be paid at once, the remainder in a month. Lamplough t. Kodgers. Claim for £36 19s lOd. Defendant did not a| pear. Judgment for plaintiff for sum claimed, with costs 255. Lamplough v. Sullivan for £6 Is 104 Defendant did not appear. Judgment for plaintiff for whole amount, wifi costs 13s. Patterson v. Paul, for £1 lis 3d. Defendant not appearing, judgment for plaintiff, with costs —9s. Patterson v. Benny, for £3 19a 5i Judgment for plaintiff, as defendant was absent, with 9s costs. Patterson v. Jack. Claim £2 12a In this case also the defendant did not put in appearance. Judgment for plaintiff for amount claimed, with 9i ±iafferty v. Whelan. This information stated that the defendant did unlawfully, and wilfully, and maliciously commit damage and injury to 'certain personal property of the plaintiff, bj breaking about ten dozen glass bottles, of the value of ten shillings ; also, for destroying about seven yards of iron fencing of the value of 'five shillings. Aa the informant did not appear the case was struck out. m
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18720306.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Westport Times, Volume VI, Issue 937, 6 March 1872, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
202RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume VI, Issue 937, 6 March 1872, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.