RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT.
Friday, Mat 6. (Before J. Giles, Esq., E.M.) Angus Hay v. William Collings.— Claim for £3 9s for bread supplied. Plaintiff stated in evidence that defendant was one of a party of three mining at Hatter's Terrace, the names of the others were Cowan and M'lntyre. The debt had been incurred in January and February, 1869, and the defendant was then living in the same tent with M'lntyre and Cowan. M'lntyre ordered the goods in the first instance and defendant also told him, when working in tbe tunnel, to serve him. Defendant had recognised the debt, and when asked for the money had made no objection to the account, but said he had no money. Defendant said that for a week or ten days after January Ist, when the account in dis-
pute commenced, he was at the Buller He denied having lived with M'lntyre and Cowan as a general thing, and when stopping in their tent he purchased his owh provisions. "When plaintiff brought his account he referred him to Cowan, as he had nothing to do with it. Plaintiff was nonsuited. Bame v. James and Thomas French. —ln each case judgment was confessed. Whyte and Pirie v. Pitzgerald, and same v. Templeton.—Judgment in each case by default..
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WEST18700507.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 655, 7 May 1870, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
212RESIDENT MAGISTRATE COURT. Westport Times, Volume IV, Issue 655, 7 May 1870, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.