TENUI RABBIT CASES.
[to the editor,]
Sir, —Surely jour Tenui correspondent has not beard of the punishment that overtook Ananias or he would not have written the gross mis-statement that appears in your issue of the 21st. The paragraph I refer to is this: "Mr J. Langdon thought that if his neighbours had taken steps to destroy rabbits on their sections he ivould not have so many as the Inspector stated." It is perhaps hardly necessary for mo to deny this statement, as there were so many present to hear what I really said, but I ask the Court and the audience to coiToborate my statement, that I never moutioned my neighbours or their rabbits, and I ask your talented correspondent to be careful in future how he couples my name with such a fictitious story as that referred to. I am, etc, JiMES S, LiNGDON. [We trust ourTenui Correspondent will bo able to explain the discrepancy.—Ed. W.D.T.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18950329.2.24
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4988, 29 March 1895, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
158TENUI RABBIT CASES. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4988, 29 March 1895, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in