MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
M ASTERTON. - FRIDAY.
[Bofuro Mr T. Hutchison, S.M.]
M'-UW CASKS. , J. C. Ingram v. Pinlioy Bros.— A Defendants wore charged with ply- ™ ing for hire with an unlicensed vehicle. The evidenco of A. J. Hathaway, Inspector of Hackney Carriages, was that the defendants bad plied for hiro without a license, and bad been warned by him. .Fined one shilling, without costs. Inspector Ingram v. Morris Wright —Defendant was charged with carrying parcels on an unlicensed vehicle, other than passenger's luggage, and pleaded guilty. Fined Is, without costs.
Ingram v Hood and Johnston, Tlie charge was for allowing rubbish to accumulate on their premises, Defondants pleaded not guilty. J. C. Ingram gave evidence that ou 20th instant lie visited tho premises and asked the man who clears away rubbish to see Mr Hood. He had visited the premises previously and gave verbal notice to get the rubbish removed. The rubbish bad since been cleared away and his object attained. His worship im- * posed a fine of one shilling without costs. Ingram vJ. Elliott, Thii was a' similar charge and defeudantpleadc i notguilty.Fined one shilling without costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18950329.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4988, 29 March 1895, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
187MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4988, 29 March 1895, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in