THE RABBIT ACT
FURTHER PROSECUTIONS. In the Mnstorton S.M. Court, yesterday afternoon, before Mr T, Hutchison, S.M., further rabbit prosecutions took place, asunder:— Inspector Miller, v. R, A. Nicholls. —Failing to destroy rabbits on his property. Evidence by the Inspector and Rabbit Agents, was given to the effect that proper steps had not been taken to destroy the rabbits, and His Worship imposed a fine of £4, with costs 7s. Miller v. J. Miller,—A similar charge. Accused pleaded guilty, and a fine of £6 with costs, was imposed. Miller v. J. Rennll.-Similarj charge. Accused pleaded guilty ' and was fined £l, without costs. Miller v. W. Wardell.-A similar charge. Accused pleaded guilty, and was lined £B, and costs 7s. Miller v. Mrs Grant-.—Similar charge. A pica of guilty was tendered, and a nominal line asked for. A line of £l, without costs, was imposed. I
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18950316.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4977, 16 March 1895, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
144THE RABBIT ACT Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XVI, Issue 4977, 16 March 1895, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in