SUPREME COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4790, 3 August 1894, Page 3

SUPREME COURT.

Tho following cases are set down for hearing at the civil sittings of the Supremo Court, which begin at Wellington on Monday next. WITHOUT A JURY, J. Mnginnity v T. M. Jackson, claim £lO5 6s Bd, amount of promissory note. J, Kcenan v tho ..Public Trustee anchors, administration suit, nnd otlicrs v J. 'Sclanders and Co, claim £250, amount advanced by trustees for investment, Martha Mahupuku v Tamahau Mahupuku, action to revoke probate. Hannah Stutfield v Matilda Kennedy and another. Decree for accounts, P. L, McLaren v H, Morison and another, action for dissolution of partnership, D. Egan v. J. Dealy and another, action for delivery of leases. Karl Locher v. J, Howlott and others, action for specific performance. SPECIAL JURY OF POUR. Eva B. Donnelly v. F. J. Pinny, claim £5Ol damages for alleged wrongful seizure. Margaret Donnelly v. F, J, Pinny, claim £2Ol, damages for breaking and entering. SPECIAL JURV OF TWKLVE. I O'Keeffo v, C. Phillips, claim I £5Ol damages for malicious prosecution. H, Wilson v. J. Kirkcaldie and] another, action for dissolution of partnership, COJIMOX JURY OF TWEM'K, . Hung Foo v. Wong You, claim £soo.danmges for wrongful entry, . and £350 value of gppds, . J. Pitcher v. T.'Beadnall, claim £5Ol damages for slander! ••■' MIXBl) COMMON JWiy O?TpLVJi, • Hapi Te Kangitotyiiataand others v. A. P. Stuart and J. Dayics, claim £236812.3 balance of purchase money,

I : .■•■.. DIVORCE. .. ■' Ja-no Harris v. Homy Harris, dcoreoma | Mario Eugenie Hartley v. J, W. Hartloy, decree absolute.