R.M. COURT.
• . , MASTERTON-TUESDAY. j (Before T. Hutchison, Esq, 1UI,) l BNfcAinering and L, Thomson ' v> EdJßioffßoard, T.Spackmanand , B. WTTratban.—Thia case, which 4 was adjourned on Friday last to enable i the B.M, to decide who was the pro- ' per person to receive the money paid ( into Conrt by the Education Board, was heard before Mr Hutchiaon this morning. * Mr Pownall bri:-fly reviewed the « case, showing that Sr.ackrn.an was the t t """" original contractor, but Trathan was 1 [' adjudged bis partner and completed j p the work, Spackman agreed to pay ' ( I to Trathan all moneys paid to him by | >, the Education Board, and it was to ; Trathan that the money should be j \ made over. Mr Beard expressed himself pre- > \ pared to admit that Trathan should ] V have the money. > \\ Judgment, therefore, was given by consent, for Trathan. Mr Pownall applied for cos's agiinst the ■ daintiffa. . After hearing legal I argument bia Worship refused. Immediately after the Court rose a ; distress warrent was put into execution, and the money impounded on )., behalf of B. E. Mannering and L. L Thomson. |U » 1
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18940116.2.15
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4623, 16 January 1894, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
182R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4623, 16 January 1894, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.