R.M.COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XV, Issue 4457, 29 June 1893, Page 3

R.M.COURT.

MABTERTON. -THURSDAY. (Before Mr T. Hutchison, R.M.) OlVlli CASES, Danny i. Ockondcn. Claim 10s Gd. Judgment for plaintiff with costs, T, P, Lett v. Speckman, Claim £l2 158. Judgment for plaintiff with costs. Graham & Co,, v. H, McOutcheon. Claim £9 10a 3d, Mr Pownall for plaintiff. Judgmont by default with costs and counsel's fee £1 Is. Andrews V. William White, Claim £7 0s 7d,balnnce of wagesdue. Mr Bunny for plaintiff. Evidence in support of the claim wasgiven by Mrs Andrews and Charles Manning. W. W bite on oath stated that the amount had been paid, and that he had made a memo in his diary to that filed, His Worship said that from the evi denco <F?:o him bo should give judgment lor tho umount claimed with costs. Smith v, Johnston. Mr Pownall for plaintiff. Claim 63 for an advertisement. Defendant objected to payment owing to a block having been inserted without his instructions. J. Pnyton, called by defendant, gave evidence regarding the custom in serting emblems over advertisements. His Worahipgavejudgmeut for the amount paid into Court, viz: 4s 6d, with costs for defendant. H. Jones v. P. C. Frazi. Claim £5 2s 4d on judgment summous. Mr Beard applied for an order to be niido on behalf of j udgraont creditor, Mr Skipper appenrod for defendant. An order was made for payment of the amount within a fortnight,'or in default fourteen days' imprisonment. Wong You v. Harrisiin.. Mr Jackson for plaintiff. Mr Pownall for defendant. This wsb a olaim for £G Id interest on an account of £l2 ss, I Wong £pu, on oath, gavo evidence | in supp'ffof the claim. Defendant had prdf W to pay tho claim with interdK-jd plaintiff had agreed to note, This had Mkbeen dono, HnMr Pownall: Had charged at BHfcof 10s per month on the acHflKThe total intort-Bt claimed and was charged as from undertaking to made on January oi for plaintiff, reHHBHftnt offering some six 0 W° n 8 ou a P ro " Was present in tho shop when the made. The pronever given. Mr owna " there had been less than 100 per on the amount promissory note was to be HBeßmontua, whereas the interest BHBas for thirteen months. the defendant, Baid HHwut was rendered to him by ■■■jiff in January last. The supplied to men who were him. Boon after getting went to plaintifl a promissory note interest on the note. HHHhHL to the HBHBfIHBk' cou '^ subseHHH^^^^HBfcvalued over th(