R.M. COURT.

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XIII, Issue 4152, 30 June 1892, Page 3

R.M. COURT.

GREYTOWN.-WEDNESDAI V {Before Col.'Roberts, R.M,) J, M. O'Connor v. W. Pole. Claim 9a 6d, gooda supplied. Judijment fur ;plHintiß with cirst". Baniev, flam Isaac Claim £3 10s 6d, Judgment for amount with costs. Same v. Honi Kgateur. Claim £118? 6d. Judgment fur amount with costs, Same v. Kirgi Ngaieure; Sarue v, Henry King; Same v. Puraki Maika; judgment fur plaintiffs in all cases with costs. Mr Izard for plaintiff. J.Hebb-y v, H. Smith. Claim admitted. Moxtonßros. v.J.Hutana— claim admitted; same v. W. Andrew, judgfor plaiutiff; same v. Isaao * Hulnna; judgment for plaintiff, Several civil oases were confessed and judgment given. James Andrew Haxton v, h e sons; claiming support, Mr Tate for plaintiff, and Mr-Pownall for defendants, After the plaintiff had been cross examined and questioned by the counsel on both sides, His Worship said as'the sons were willing to support their father, contributing 8s 6d por week, two at 8s per week and one at 2s 6d, he would issue an order to that effect, The Court then adjourned. MASTERTON-THURSDAY, Before Colonel Roberts, R.M.) TH2 CIVIL LIST. Exeotitora of the late P, Dickson v W. Tanner.—Olsira, £Bl7s Bd. Mr Bunny for plaintiffs, Judgment for the amount claimed, with Court costs 6s, atld counsel's fee 21s. Same v Mrs Bommerville.-Claim 123. Judgment for the amount claimed, with Court coats 6s, jr Bank of New South Wales v C. J. Claim on dishonoured promissory note, £22 Os 4d. Mr Beard for plaintiff. Judgment for the amount claimed, witK Court costs 31b and counsel's fee 21s, Mrs Ewington r Matiihera Maaka, —Olaim on judgment summons, Mr Beard appeared for the judgment debtor, and took exception to the form of summons, inasmuch as the . summons was served in April, and , ordered to come on for hearing in ( March, Mr Bunny for the judgment creditor, submitted that the infor- , mality did not affect the judgment. , After some argument the hearing of ] the original case was adjourned for a , fortnight. . Same v Mrs Manihera Maaka, , This was a similar citse to the above, and was also adjourned for a fori- . night. , dame v Hanita Anaru, adjourned, , as there was no interpreter, C. Goddard v H, Burling,—Olsim . for £22 Is for work and labour done, Mr Bunny for the plaintiff, and Mr . Beard for tho defendant. The plaintiff, on oath, stated that he had rendered several accounts, and the lyefendant, had frequently offered to ; fettle. For the defence, a number j of items in tho statement of claim j were disputed. , (Left Sitting). ,