CORRESPONDENCE.
(To the Editor.) Sir, —Kindly allow me space in your yaluable paper for a few remarks re Mauriceville Notes by " Rustic," which appeared in your issue of yes terday. There can be no doubt that "Rustic" has been very hard on us poor " Scandies," as he pleases to call us, because we, as he thinks, have prevented an increase of publican's licenses in the district, by which he fancies we haye done a very bad and blameworthy deed. In our opinion we did a good day's work on the polling day; we"Scandies" have lived in Mauriceville for a good many years, and have done well without an hotel. Maybe we are not rich, but we are happy aud content, which, I fear, cannot be said of all the people in townships where they have got the blessed institutions, and are " head and shoulders above us," and therefore we think we could do some time yet without it. When he says chat we " foreigners are but imperfectly acquainted with the English language " he is right, and I am therefore unable to express myself as I would like, but if hi should thereby conclude that this means ignorance in every respect, I must tell him that he is mistaken. We know our own language pretty well, and a good many of us have some knowledge of the English too, and there are people among us well acquainted with their language. I wonder if this can be said of " .Rustic" and his friends. We yery well know what we do, and are not so easily led away by misrepresentations as he thinks. And when he further says that " strangers visiting Mauriceville search in vain for a place to put their heads in" and " must munch their bipcuils on the road-side," he very well knows that this cannot bo for want of accommodation. We have two, if not three accommodation houses in Mauriceville, which I Jjave heard travellers recommend as well conducted, especially those in the township, but if the only reason why strangers speak " with disgust" of Mauriceville is that they cannot obtain spirituous liquor here, we say, let them go where they can get it; we can live without it. I have never seen it proved yet that an hotel has added to the moral welfare of a community, g.nd I doubt very much if it would be any advantage pp us; therefore we bigotted, narrow-minded " Scandies" will try to keep it out as long as we can. I am, &c., SjCANpY. Mauriceville, Sept, 18th, 169 J.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18910919.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3917, 19 September 1891, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
426CORRESPONDENCE. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XII, Issue 3917, 19 September 1891, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.