R.M. COURT.
PAHIATU A—T CESD AY. (Before Colonel Roberts R.M.) CIVIL CASES. Birnie v King. Judgment summons. Adjourned till next Court day. Smith v Reardon. Claim £l2 17s 9d for busbfalling, Mr Gould for plaintiff, Mr Smith for defendant. The defence to the claim was that the plaintiff was a partner. After a quantity of contradictory evidence the case was adjourned on the application of the defendant. Miller, the superintendent of the bushfelling was absent. The proceedings in two other esses were cancelled. ASSAULT. Smith v'Reardon, Assault. Mr Gould for plaintiff, Mr Smith lor defendant. Mr Smith contended that the proceedings were out of order, as the case was adjourned till die 19th of January. Through the Clerk's absence there was no sitting that day.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18910204.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3727, 4 February 1891, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
125R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3727, 4 February 1891, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in