MASTERTON-MONDAY.
■ BoLfIEIM V. PuBMC TIHJBTH! AND . Wi Mauupuku. .This was a case in which the plaintiff, Henry .Bolheim.clahned the sum of £56 from the .defendants for work done in the estate of NoperaTiki, a deceased Kative. Tho followingjury was empanelled; 4-Messrs Holdaway (foreman), Gavo, Cole and Cox, _ Mr Beard appeared for the plaintiff and Mrßunny for. the defendants, ! Mr Beard briefly; stated the base. •Mr Bunny produced a certificate from Dr Bey that the defendant Wi Mahupuku was not in a condition t§ attend the sittings of the GoriL.m would therefore ask for an Sojournment. '' ' : Mr Beard wwquits willing that an adjournment bo made' r to v Greytowu. • After considerable argument it was decided to proceed with the case, • The evidence produced is the same at that .given recently before ; the R.M. in'Hreytriwn.j' '■''[ [ \ [toft Bitting]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18901215.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3687, 15 December 1890, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
135MASTERTON-MONDAY. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3687, 15 December 1890, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in