R. M. COURT.
EKETAHUNA-FEIDAY.
(Before Colonel Eoberts E.M.)
Police v Joseph Stringer, Applj cation by Constable. Koohe for a prohibition order.-/ The constable, sworn, deposed that he had known defendant for a considerable time. He then read a long list of .convictions recorded against him. ■''.''■:"
The order was granted as applied for.
Huxtable y Waterson, No appearance of defendant/Judgment for amount olaimed, £l, with _J. Jones vD. ifcGill; adjourned till : next Court day. '■
' Huxtable vO. Oulleu, Judgment summons, Mr Gould for defendant. Debtor was examined at considerable length by plaintiff.
Mr Kelliher was also oalled by plaintiff, in whose service defendant had been.
An order was made that debtor pay the sum of 5s .per week, the first payment to be made on the sth September, in default 8 days'in Wellington gaol, : J ,'
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18900823.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3395, 23 August 1890, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
133R.M. COURT. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3395, 23 August 1890, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in