Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Conspiracy.

CnnisTCiiuncH, July 10, The Kaikoura conspiracy case, heard at the April cr'sminal session, cropped up again to-day in the Supreme Court, when Mr Cook, the then prosecutor, obtained a verdict of LBOO damages against Carter, ono of the convicted conspirators, Two witnesses were brought into Court in their prison uniform, Mr Justice Denniston cousiderod such course objectionable.

Poaching Prosecutions, CuUISTCHUECII, July 10. Two charges of illegally selling and lniving trout iu their possession out of season were heard to-day against Henry Jones, manager for Mr Warnes, fishmonger, also against James Hatfield, steward .of the

Canterbury Club, for buying and having possession of the same. The informations were laid by Mr Gair, Secretary of tho Acclimatisation Society, Mr Packman acting on their behalf; Mr Free defended both cases. Hatfield admitted the offence. Tho evidence showed that Jones telephoned to Hatfield that he lmd some splendid trout, weighing nine pounds, on June 26th, and asked for them nino shillings. Hatfield received the fish, which was charged in the account as English salmon, On the Club's dinner menu it was called boiled trout, Hatfield admitted not being able to. purchase English salmon, Mr Beetham, in giving judgment, said tho oases were serious. Jones' previous dealings with the Club, tho trout on the tablo, and the receipted account, all pointed to a knowledge of the fish. Such cases wero difficult to establish. Many escaped because tlio Society was not wealthy enough to prosecute. There was a wide differeiico between poaching in tho Old Country and hero, where great expense was incurred for importation. There was no excuse hero for poaching, as a small fee permitted anyone to fish for all kinds, Ho should mark the offence by inflicting a hoivy penalty. Both inon wero equally blamed, and both were fined £2O. Mr Spackman withdrew the charge of illegally having the fish in.their possessio^

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18890711.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3253, 11 July 1889, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
310

Conspiracy. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3253, 11 July 1889, Page 2

Conspiracy. Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume X, Issue 3253, 11 July 1889, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert